requestId:68499ac3186fa5.65686134.
WeChat Discussion on Xunzi’s “Natural Talk” (I)
Author: Lin Guizhen Qiang Zhonghua
Source: Author Authorized Confucian Network Published
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s and was the first day of the month of Jihai Pu. Xinwei
�
【Lin Guizhen】A seminar in Beijing.
[Strong Zhonghua] Only by saying “sexuality” can you still think about it. Xunzi said that “nature is good”, and it is important to emphasize that this is born and possessed, not acquired. What specific content does the born quality contain? Short-term cultivationXunzi at most saw the nature of knowledge, the nature of wisdom, the nature of desire, and perhaps the nature of weak morality. Among them, there are evil buds in the nature that you want to see, which is the nature of “nature vicious”.
[Strong Zhonghua] For an analogy, we see naturally growing wild fruits in the deep mountains and old forests. We say that they are wild and have a peaceful life. But when I see it, we will tell if this kind of wild fruit is sweet, sour, bitter.
【Strong Chinese】Sweet and bitter are originally possessed, and this is the character of nature; Inclusive dcard But sweet and bitter are also different at the same time.
【Lin Guizhen】This category is more serious than social evil! Sweet and bitterness are still inherent in nature, and their own material nature (human tastes that the material nature is as good as the material nature), as Xunzi said, the straightness and non-standardness of primitive trees and primitive woods.
【Lin Guizhen】I don’t understand my fellow brother. When reading the original text of “Sexual Abuse”, it means that you can prove “Sexual Abuse” by seeking results or being evil. Don’t think far away to adjust and the meaning of “Sexual Abuse-Sexual Abuse”. Please tightly describe the text and logic of “Xunzi” and tightly describe the original words of “sexual evil”! The desire for results may be bad or bad, that is, the desire result or bad or bad. This statement indicates that “sexual evil” is problematic and invalid, because sexual evil does not mean that the nature itself is evil (the fate of “sexual evil” is that the nature itself is evil, and social consequences occur when the sex occurs or when the sex occurs, that is, “biased and contradictory” evil), but there is no problem in changing to “sexual evil, so bad” (I said that this explanation was long ago). Xunzi talked about “Pu” and pointed out that “nature is good”, which is actually based on “nature is bad” and “nature is good”.” (It seems that the type of slang is “straight-not straight”) is said.
【Strong Zhonghua】 Note that it is just a germination of evil. If this germination is cured, it will not be suppressed by the mind. The germination of evil will gradually grow and expand, resulting in malignant consequences.
[Lin Guizhen]〖In this, there is a germination in the nature of the desire to see, and this is the nature of the nature of the nature.〗——This is the root of the metaphysical theory of the essence. Mencius and Dong Zi all thought this way, let alone Zhu Zi later.
[Strong Zhonghua] We seem to be able to organize thisBaozhuangThe two articles discuss the discussion, and it is difficult to deal with the science, and do not fight with the scene, nor do you have any intention.
【Lin Guizhen】The opening of Xunzi’s “Natural Abuse” commentary logic only says that it is beneficial, sick, and physical desire. href=”https://twsugarhoney520.org/”>Integrate the pipelineThe social results of the three are evil. To say that these three are “scarcity germination” is like Dong Zi’s “good and good quality”.
[Lin Guizhen] The germination theory and the tertiary theory are the same. You explain the evil nature, Dong Zhongshu Explain the good nature. The so-called good nature confusion is actually the same as this.
[Strong Zhonghua] I am the budding of good nature confusion.
[Lin Guizhen] That’s not to mention it. You insist on the root of the root of your life and naturally ignore my explanation. I insist on “nature is bad-nature-nature-nature dissatisfaction”, and naturally disagree I am the root cause of Dong Zi’s metaphysical learning. This is the difference in thinking and position between the “metaphysical learning” and the “experience theory” symposium, which I said on April 5 at the Xunzi Association of Lanling.
[Lin Guizhen] However, the academic community accepted the “genius” and the task of teacher Zhou Cheng won for half a year.
p>
【Strong Zhonghua】The germination of evil, the germination of goodness, and the germination of intelligence are all born, but they are all developed and not enough to be good and smart.
【Strong Zhonghua】When Teacher Zhou Cheng was alive, he hoped that I would write an article to respond. I did not agree with his views. I wanted to think carefully and write a commentary article. He suddenly passed away, href=”https://twpinkhoney.net/”>Long-term careI think it seems that writing articles again seems a bit unharsh, so I made a fuss.
【Lin Guizhen】I think Xunzi is the material of structural efficiency, not the source of metaphysical essential theory Basically, I have emphasized this at the Xunzi Association of Lanling. If you stick to the root of nature, there is no way to tell me. It is best to sing and adjust each other without having to tell the truth. This is the wisest.
【Lin Guizhen】Mr. Zhou said that the text of “Natural Abuse” is mixed and added later, saying that it is not written by Xunzi and is not worth a visit. I understand, but not the same.
[Strong Chinese] I also disagree with the metaphysical root theory. But when a person is born, it seems that he has the above structural effect. Integrity
[Lin Guizhen] Abstract end-level theory and source-based theory are metaphysical thinking.
[Strong Zhonghua] is not abstract, but the structural effectiveness of the four natures mentioned below has been initially possessed. If it is the root of abstraction, it refers to the metaphysical principles of the reason why these four natures exist.
【Lin Guizhen】The “Nature Abuse” says that people have the quality and ability to know and distinguish benevolence and righteousness, and according to metaphysical thinking, they can be simplified into the “nature good” discussion, or perhaps “good heart” discussion, based on the gourd. Finally, Xunzi said, “Natural aphorism + Nature aphorism + Mind aphorism + Mind aphorism + Mind aphorism + Nature aphorism + Mind aphorism + Mind aphorism”, “Wuyang! Baoqing.com
【Lin Guizhen】〖If it is an abstract root, it refers to the metaphysical principles of the existence of these four natures. 〗——You don’t know how to learn about metaphysical thinking, but I have a brief understanding of this form of thinking when I do philosophy.
【Strong Chinese】 We are not doing metaphysical thinking, but rather understanding the structural effectiveness of what you say.
[Lin Guizhen] There is a new “invention” that is different from creating “seeds” to explain “nature is evil-nature is good”.
【Lin Guizhen】Scientific analysis of structure effectiveness is not about thinking and distorting the condom, but psychological analysis, mental analysis, and cognitive analysis.
【Strong Zhonghua】 Although it does not reach a common understanding, it is still very interesting to discuss.
【Lin Guizhen】 The “clear eyes and ears” mentioned by Xunzi is scientific analysis, and you must understand it!
【Strong Zhonghua】 “Bright eyes and ears” has a foundation for newborns. After learning after acquired teaching, I trust Xunzi not to deny the foundation for newborns.
【Lin Guizhen】 Xunzi believed that the “data materials-functional talents” problems that have been born by ordinary people or ordinary people are broadly known as human beings and wisdom, knowledge and kindness. Knowledge and desire to see, and understanding and discernment are all nature or ability under the nature of the material nature. Xunzi said that this is the process of cumulative growth and growth. In fact, people are so aware of this, and they are also a process. But Xunzi also had a growth process without saying that nature. For example, the organs and talents that lead to the human heart have a development process from embryo to birth to adulthood. If XunWhen Zi said this, he would analyze it more scientifically and more verbosely. However, Xunzi is not a metaphysical simple and simple thinking of the origin and basic theory. This thinking is too “superb” but also too “simple”.
【Lin Guizhen】Another sup
發佈留言